Let
be a commutative ring. (Recall that we always assume ring to
be unital associative.)
Amazingly enough(!?), any element
in
is central.
As we have seen in the Schur's Lemma, for any “finite dimensional”
irreducible representation
of
,
should be a
scalar. Thus we see that any irreducible “finite dimensional”
irreducible representation of
should be one dimensional.
Though this argument does not make sense when
has no restriction
such as “
is finitely generated over a field”,
we may begin by considering a one-dimensional representation of
.
That means, a ring homomorphism
where
is a field.
One knows that
-
is an integral domain. That means, it has no
zero-divisor other than zero. (In this sense,
is said to
be a prime ideal of
.)
is decomposed in the following way.
where
is the field of fractions of a ring
.
With a suitable definition of “equivalence" of such representations,
we may identify equivalence class of representation with
the kernel
.
In other words, we are interested in prime ideals.
DEFINITION 07.1
Let
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f58b/9f58b7cca4c06b500a6ba9dccb8921d07a026a7f" alt="$A$"
be a commutative ring.
Then we define the set
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a16d2/a16d2befae5ce707ae12bd03ee93e78608dc99d3" alt="$\operatorname{Spec}(A)$"
of spectrum of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f58b/9f58b7cca4c06b500a6ba9dccb8921d07a026a7f" alt="$A$"
as the set of
prime ideals of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f58b/9f58b7cca4c06b500a6ba9dccb8921d07a026a7f" alt="$A$"
.
We note that for any
, we have a ring homomorphism
(“representation associated to
”)
defined by
Since
is an inclusion, we may say, by abuse of language,
that the value of an element
under the representation
is equal to
. We note further that
holds.
Let us now define a topology on
.
DEFINITION 07.2
Let
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f58b/9f58b7cca4c06b500a6ba9dccb8921d07a026a7f" alt="$A$"
be a commutative ring.
For any
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/622ce/622ce0a6ab911897e81041e710d75c214ec55208" alt="$f\in A$"
, we define a subset
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebe8c/ebe8cb9b21797362db24c041fa0aa704961a5e4b" alt="$O_f$"
of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a16d2/a16d2befae5ce707ae12bd03ee93e78608dc99d3" alt="$\operatorname{Spec}(A)$"
defined by
PROOF..
DEFINITION 07.4
The topology defined in the preceding Lemma is called the Zariski topology of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a16d2/a16d2befae5ce707ae12bd03ee93e78608dc99d3" alt="$\operatorname{Spec}(A)$"
.
In Part II, we always equip
with the Zariski topology.
Thus for any commutative ring
, we may always associate a topological
space
.