Next: sheafication of a sheaf
Up: Algebraic geometry and Ring
Previous: homomorphisms of (pre)sheaves
To proceed our theory further, we need to study a bit more about presheaves.
Unfortunately, a sheaf of modules
on an affine schemes are ``too good''. Namely,
in terms of cohomology (which we study later,) we have always
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39708/39708c647133cadffe7a1b6eec86b7544562f2d1" alt="% latex2html id marker 2198
$\displaystyle H^i (\operatorname{Spec}(A),\tilde {M} )=0 \qquad ($"
if
So to study some important problems on sheaf theory (which we
will sure to encounter when we deal with non-affine schemes,)
we need to study some examples from other mathematical areas.
A first example is a presheaf which satisfies the ``locality'' of sheaf axiom,
but which fails to obey ``gluing lemma''.
EXAMPLE 06.9
Let
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ef89/8ef898cd4b66bf42974ae8301d44896160a2c917" alt="$ X=\mathbb{R}$"
be the (usual) real line with the usual Lebesgue measure.
Then we have a presheaf of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/701af/701af24b41581daa6dd5111bcad223876ee5372c" alt="$ L^1$"
-functions given by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/992df/992dfdc470092a458b22e39b7c0dee2c05a4c530" alt="$\displaystyle L^1(U)=\{ f:U\to \mathbb{C}; \vert f\vert$"
is integrable
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/701af/701af24b41581daa6dd5111bcad223876ee5372c" alt="$ L^1$"
is a presheaf which satisfies the ``locality'' of sheaf axiom,
but which fails to obey ``gluing lemma''.
Indeed, Let
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95275/952756c5eee091df4699111b847bca645f43e8ec" alt="$ \{U_n=(-n, n)\}$"
be an open covering of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd5b4/fd5b4bb30598b56b65577375f708833cf3351195" alt="$ \mathbb{R}$"
and define
a section
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f91c4/f91c40c80a8cb7eb02838e5ef0fec5a40bb4fbea" alt="$ f_n$"
on
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/354c2/354c23c600cd5957f7e4d2222aafef4a86d0e8fa" alt="$ U_n$"
by
Then we see immediately that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1ced/f1ced8ca566b052a0503ef759a7d535d91989285" alt="$ \{f_n\}$"
is a family of sections which satisfies
the assumption of ``gluing lemma''. The function which should
appear as the ``glued function'' is the constant function
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf55d/bf55ddf5253f7c29871744bd03e68249b6d153bf" alt="$ 1$"
, which
fails to be integrable on the whole of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd5b4/fd5b4bb30598b56b65577375f708833cf3351195" alt="$ \mathbb{R}$"
.
We may ``sheaficate'' the presheaf
above.
Instead of
-functions we consider functions which are locally
.
Namely, for any open subset
, we consider
The presheaf so defined is a sheaf, which we may call ``the sheaf of
locally
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/701af/701af24b41581daa6dd5111bcad223876ee5372c" alt="$ L^1$"
-functions''.
EXAMPLE 06.10
Similarly, we may consider a presheaf
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56833/568338101e4ec8010a2d4d16836aaca21635a9a7" alt="$ U\mapsto$"
Bdd
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8056/d8056073b13787abd11883f3992a82c3f88ea03b" alt="$ (U)$"
of bounded functions on a topological
space
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f74c6/f74c6f596134f1a7bcd8de0adc6e08acfcc8338b" alt="$ X$"
. We may sheaficate this example and the sheaf so created is
the sheaf of locally bounded functions.
EXAMPLE 06.11
It is psychologically a bit difficult to give an example of
a presheaf which does not satisfy the locality axiom of a sheaf.
But there are in fact a lot of them.
For any differentiable (
) manifold
(students
which are not familiar with the manifolds may take
as an open
subset of
for an example.),
we define a presheaf
on
defined as follows
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2de43/2de43515eb8653de1400013dd85b3ea7bd234cfb" alt="$\displaystyle \mathcal G(U)=C^{\infty}(U\times U)=
\{$"
complex valued $C^&infin#infty;$-functions on $U×U$
The restriction is defined in an obvious manner.
It is an easy exercise to see that the presheaf does not satisfy the
locality axiom of a sheaf.
To sheaficate this, we first need to introduce an equivalence relation on
.
Then we may easily see that
holds.
Then we define
It is now an easy exercise again to verify that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44bec/44bec53cc569497f76e9608beff6b8836a414b3a" alt="$ \mathcal F$"
so defined
is a sheaf.
(Readers who are familiar with the theory of jets may notice that
the sheaf is related to the sheaf of jets. In other words, there is a
sheaf homomorphism from this sheaf to the sheaf of jets.)
Next: sheafication of a sheaf
Up: Algebraic geometry and Ring
Previous: homomorphisms of (pre)sheaves
2017-07-21