Next: sheafification of a sheaf
Up: (Usual) affine schemes
Previous: homomorphisms of (pre)sheaves
To proceed our theory further, we need to study a bit more about presheaves.
Unfortunately, a sheaf of modules
on an affine schemes are ``too good''. Namely,
in terms of cohomology (which we study later,) we have always
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af28b/af28b7ec8ccc7f2f5df10aa2e441afc8c2f942e5" alt="$\displaystyle H^i (\operatorname{Spec}(A),\tilde {M} )=0 \qquad ($"
if
So to study some important problems on sheaf theory (which we
will sure to encounter when we deal with non-affine schemes,)
we need to study some examples from other mathematical areas.
A first example is a presheaf which satisfies the ``locality'' of sheaf axiom,
but which fails to obey ``gluing lemma''.
EXAMPLE 1.25
Let
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd6af/dd6afca6e9669c3c95445ce561669a13e8a15bee" alt="$ X=\mathbb{R}$"
be the (usual) real line with the usual Lebesgue measure.
Then we have a presheaf of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db8d7/db8d726345a2b1ac7a0f0f9a868ba00f9f613206" alt="$ L^1$"
-functions given by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da9bd/da9bd95ae46724485937dab86ba4b19c77c2b87e" alt="$\displaystyle L^1(U)=\{ f:U\to \mathbb{C}; \vert f\vert$"
is integrable
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db8d7/db8d726345a2b1ac7a0f0f9a868ba00f9f613206" alt="$ L^1$"
is a presheaf which satisfies the ``locality'' of sheaf axiom,
but which fails to obey ``gluing lemma''.
Indeed, Let
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7df04/7df048c60aea82a4ab0211ff4f47a806610f27e4" alt="$ \{U_n=(-n, n)\}$"
be an open covering of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99564/995645babc67db309cb7f9fbfe12e9cb8339666a" alt="$ \mathbb{R}$"
and define
a section
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9200/c92004b79a0d27d3330dcb9c61ef5f460da334ee" alt="$ f_n$"
on
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6d9c/a6d9ca1b5c2846b1561747b19517c84c40e78b2a" alt="$ U_n$"
by
Then we see immediately that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6f56/a6f56fc8759f3eb2e1c560d085c80393481fdd55" alt="$ \{f_n\}$"
is a family of sections which satisfies
the assumption of ``gluing lemma''. The function which should
appear as the ``glued function'' is the constant function
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5af23/5af23861d410d605c5fb514e73bd55695555b664" alt="$ 1$"
, which
fails to be integrable on the whole of
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99564/995645babc67db309cb7f9fbfe12e9cb8339666a" alt="$ \mathbb{R}$"
.
We may ``sheafificate'' the presheaf
above.
Instead of
-functions we consider functions which are locally
.
Namely, for any open subset
, we consider
The presheaf so defined is a sheaf, which we may call ``the sheaf of
locally
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db8d7/db8d726345a2b1ac7a0f0f9a868ba00f9f613206" alt="$ L^1$"
-functions''.
EXAMPLE 1.26
Similarly, we may consider a presheaf
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e420d/e420d72c9ff6c7d73879adf3da7481466c723bef" alt="$ U\mapsto$"
Bdd
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89034/89034986e0471f80ae80adc7012d81a3afd210bf" alt="$ (U)$"
of bounded functions on a topological
space
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e63d/4e63d16816adb9e30cda881a93305e877d51c39c" alt="$ X$"
. We may sheafificate this example and the sheaf so created is
the sheaf of locally bounded functions.
EXAMPLE 1.27
It is psychologically a bit difficult to give an example of
a presheaf which does not satisfy the locality axiom of a sheaf.
But there are in fact a lot of them.
For any differentiable (
) manifold
(students
which are not familiar with the manifolds may take
as an open
subset of
for an example.),
we define a presheaf
on
defined as follows
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/625ac/625acd7f228446aab556430c5b77b7dd53ba43fa" alt="$\displaystyle \mathcal G(U)=C^{\infty}(U\times U)=
\{$"
complex valued $C^&infin#infty;$-functions on $U×U$
The restriction is defined in an obvious manner.
It is an easy exercise to see that the presheaf does not satisfy the
locality axiom of a sheaf.
To sheafificate this, we first need to introduce an equivalence relation on
.
Then we may easily see that
holds.
Then we define
It is now an easy exercise again to verify that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d88cd/d88cdade6a4dcb9780b7bb173b1b28f9a107f15a" alt="$ \mathcal F$"
so defined
is a sheaf.
(Readers who are familiar with the theory of jets may notice that
the sheaf is related to the sheaf of jets. In other words, there is a
sheaf homomorphism from this sheaf to the sheaf of jets.)
Next: sheafification of a sheaf
Up: (Usual) affine schemes
Previous: homomorphisms of (pre)sheaves
2007-12-11